New Features Request - Printable Version +- SphereCommunity (https://forum.spherecommunity.net) +-- Forum: General Discussion (/Forum-General-Discussion) +--- Forum: UO/Sphere Discussion (/Forum-UO-Sphere-Discussion) +--- Thread: New Features Request (/Thread-New-Features-Request) |
RE: New Features Request - Shaklaban - 10-23-2012 06:02 AM background version of serv.log can be useful, multiple usage of serv.log can strain the main thread (like 10 times in for loops). example: serv.logb xx //add log to queue in background thread RE: New Features Request - Lazarus - 10-25-2012 05:22 PM Please! Options to get out the general options of razor [Like Light Levels] to get again the Role play of NIGHT SIGHT and others spells! PLeaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee :'( And a any form to block easy uo too :'( RE: New Features Request - Extreme - 10-26-2012 12:18 AM (10-25-2012 05:22 PM)Lazarus Wrote: Please! Options to get out the general options of razor [Like Light Levels] to get again the Role play of NIGHT SIGHT and others spells!http://forum.spherecommunity.net/Thread-Lights-Level-s Funny, this ir your thread... maybe you didn't read it... RE: New Features Request - Lazarus - 10-26-2012 01:37 AM (10-26-2012 12:18 AM)Extreme Wrote:(10-25-2012 05:22 PM)Lazarus Wrote: Please! Options to get out the general options of razor [Like Light Levels] to get again the Role play of NIGHT SIGHT and others spells!http://forum.spherecommunity.net/Thread-Lights-Level-s Yep, I have read it, but I don't want the MISS CHANCE in nights or something else. I just want to give night sight the real rol ^_^ RE: New Features Request - ShiryuX - 10-26-2012 05:57 AM Moving log to a background thread would imply modifying lots of code just for a minor feature with no real impact in the server usage/performance. Though, you need the date() to be precise and you need to have the correct order of logs in the correct time (you can't leave that to a background thread which can respond whenever they feel it). About nightsight, I'll answer it (and was answered by me in the old forums) in the other thread, it's a Razor feature and they can be disabled. Have to code that in the source. I can't remember if these are the right flags, but this was supposed to be implemented in some time, of course I don't have that much time. Code: // RazorFeatures, used to control the razor (3rd party tool) features ( default 0 ) No way to intercept EasyUO, this was requested many times and seems that people don't get the point. EasyUO is a Macro Tool, it doesn't send any packet to server saying "Hey, I'm EasyUO, nice to meet you!", it doesn't inform the server. EasyUO gives you a platform to script your client behavoir, allows you to program your (repetitive) actions, so we only see a client <-> server interaction, like if the char was controlled by a human, nothing else. RE: New Features Request - Lazarus - 10-26-2012 08:50 AM (10-26-2012 05:57 AM)ShiryuX Wrote: If you do this, or someone do this, when he goes to sleep I will be there, watching him, and saying :"Good night my love" with a overlyatachedgirldfriend face. I swear you. RE: New Features Request - Rizz - 10-26-2012 11:22 PM (10-26-2012 05:57 AM)ShiryuX Wrote: Plz, do that I think one way to block EasyUO could be create a own client with some strange DLL attached lol RE: New Features Request - Extreme - 10-27-2012 12:28 AM Will you add these flags later? I'm sure this would be the best feature in years ;D RE: New Features Request - Lazarus - 10-27-2012 01:42 AM All the people together! Extreme! This is funny... RE: New Features Request - Extreme - 10-27-2012 10:06 PM What? Me? What I did? |