The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Use of undefined constant SAPI_NAME - assumed 'SAPI_NAME' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) - Line: 3388 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33-nmm7 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/functions.php 3388 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php 116 build_archive_link
Warning [2] Use of undefined constant IN_ARCHIVE - assumed 'IN_ARCHIVE' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) - Line: 3331 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33-nmm7 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/functions.php 3331 errorHandler->error
/inc/functions.php 3324 build_forum_breadcrumb
/showthread.php 195 build_forum_breadcrumb
Warning [2] Use of undefined constant IN_ARCHIVE - assumed 'IN_ARCHIVE' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) - Line: 3331 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33-nmm7 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/functions.php 3331 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php 195 build_forum_breadcrumb






Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
timerf instead of i_memory
Author Message
Art
Journeyman
*

Posts: 118
Likes Given: 0
Likes Received: 1 in 1 posts
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 0



Post: #3
RE: timerf instead of i_memory
You mean item timer stops, but timerf continues working? I just not sure how works 'stack' for those timerf functions. For items it's more controllable. You can see item, etc., but timerf function hovering somewhere in memory and can't see it or 'touch', and don't know how much of those timerf functions can work at same time Smile
09-10-2015 11:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
timerf instead of i_memory - Art - 09-10-2015, 03:33 PM
RE: timerf instead of i_memory - darksun84 - 09-10-2015, 08:12 PM
RE: timerf instead of i_memory - Art - 09-10-2015 11:27 PM
RE: timerf instead of i_memory - darksun84 - 09-11-2015, 12:35 AM
RE: timerf instead of i_memory - azmanomer - 09-10-2015, 11:53 PM
RE: timerf instead of i_memory - pointhz - 09-11-2015, 12:42 AM
RE: timerf instead of i_memory - darksun84 - 09-11-2015, 12:57 AM
RE: timerf instead of i_memory - pointhz - 09-11-2015, 01:40 AM
RE: timerf instead of i_memory - darksun84 - 09-11-2015, 01:50 AM
RE: timerf instead of i_memory - Art - 09-11-2015, 02:32 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)