The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Use of undefined constant SAPI_NAME - assumed 'SAPI_NAME' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) - Line: 3388 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33-nmm7 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/functions.php 3388 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php 116 build_archive_link
Warning [2] Use of undefined constant IN_ARCHIVE - assumed 'IN_ARCHIVE' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) - Line: 3331 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33-nmm7 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/functions.php 3331 errorHandler->error
/inc/functions.php 3324 build_forum_breadcrumb
/showthread.php 195 build_forum_breadcrumb
Warning [2] Use of undefined constant IN_ARCHIVE - assumed 'IN_ARCHIVE' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) - Line: 3331 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33-nmm7 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/functions.php 3331 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php 195 build_forum_breadcrumb






Poll: Sphere as Open Source or Not
Yes
No
[Show Results]
Note: This is a public poll, other users will be able to see what you voted for.
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 3 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Any progress about open source?
Author Message
XuN
Sphere Developer
*****

Posts: 852
Likes Given: 102
Likes Received: 156 in 119 posts
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 30



Post: #79
RE: Any progress about open source?
I have fixed this year and the past one two exploits making the server crash instantly with no errors or clues at all of what happened so open servers will be forced to update everything to latest builds to avoid this problem, which will cause tons of problems because of the big amount of changes made that cannot be updated from one day to another, formulas changes debalancing everything until they find out that this had to be updated and some more obvious problems. We are NOT talking about runuo, do not do comparisons, it's stupid, this is Sphere, they may have (or have not) their problems ... we have ours. I don't think any of the 'yes voters' will help out server's admins to update everything in order to have it running in latest builds like they had it ... but, hey, runuo is cool because we can have it's source ... seriously, use real arguments against or just don't post.

There are some beneficts on going open source? Of course!! but for that greedy people only wanting the source caring nothing about what is already working out there ... this is what Ben warned about sphere dying: We go open, in 2 weeks every open shard is full of retards exploiting them and taking them down ... so if we have now only a small amount of servers ... then only a very few will survive this retarded wave created by the results of a selfish and greedy voters (Not saying everyone wants it like this, but most), and this people is not saying anything to belie this words...

So, tell me, what are the beneficts of losing 35 of the 38 (not real numbers... maybe higher than reallity... probably) servers with a considerate amount of players, players which will have nowhere to wander and will finally leave UO?? These servers won't open again, these players won't play again. Sphere loses, UO loses, selfish win? -100% profit IMO.

And, again, I urge these people only saying 'vote for yes, ruo is cool, we need open source,etc' with no real arguments AT ALL to expose here a way to help those living shards from the already fixed exploits and the ones we might already have... because, you want open source to help the community, right? Start here and now then, and proof that pure will of helping.

PS: I don't think anyone will reply this, never expected, but at least be honest and don't add nonsense shit here trying to fool people like we were all stupid.
(This post was last modified: 08-09-2015 04:14 PM by XuN.)
08-09-2015 04:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 5 users Like XuN's post
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Any progress about open source? - xantier - 08-02-2015, 06:42 PM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Ben - 08-02-2015, 11:04 PM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Ben - 08-03-2015, 06:09 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Ben - 08-03-2015, 06:37 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Ben - 08-03-2015, 06:46 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - XuN - 08-03-2015, 05:43 PM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Ben - 08-03-2015, 10:37 PM
RE: Any progress about open source? - XuN - 08-04-2015, 04:22 AM
Any progress about open source? - roberpot - 08-04-2015, 08:07 PM
Any progress about open source? - roberpot - 08-04-2015, 08:44 PM
RE: Any progress about open source? - XuN - 08-05-2015, 07:15 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - XuN - 08-05-2015, 04:43 PM
Any progress about open source? - roberpot - 08-06-2015, 12:14 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Ben - 08-06-2015, 08:38 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - WRWR - 08-07-2015, 07:30 PM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Wap - 08-09-2015, 12:34 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Ben - 08-09-2015, 12:54 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - WRWR - 08-09-2015, 10:46 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - XuN - 08-09-2015 04:12 PM
RE: Any progress about open source? - XuN - 08-10-2015, 03:38 AM
Any progress about open source? - roberpot - 08-14-2015, 05:44 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Ben - 08-15-2015, 09:13 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Art - 08-27-2015, 10:43 PM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Ben - 09-02-2015, 12:21 PM
RE: Any progress about open source? - WRWR - 09-03-2015, 03:23 AM
RE: Any progress about open source? - XuN - 09-03-2015, 07:56 PM
RE: Any progress about open source? - Rizz - 09-08-2015, 04:49 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 14 Guest(s)