The following warnings occurred:
Warning [2] Use of undefined constant SAPI_NAME - assumed 'SAPI_NAME' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) - Line: 3388 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33-nmm7 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/functions.php 3388 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php 116 build_archive_link
Warning [2] Use of undefined constant IN_ARCHIVE - assumed 'IN_ARCHIVE' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) - Line: 3331 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33-nmm7 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/functions.php 3331 errorHandler->error
/inc/functions.php 3324 build_forum_breadcrumb
/showthread.php 195 build_forum_breadcrumb
Warning [2] Use of undefined constant IN_ARCHIVE - assumed 'IN_ARCHIVE' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) - Line: 3331 - File: inc/functions.php PHP 7.4.33-nmm7 (Linux)
File Line Function
/inc/functions.php 3331 errorHandler->error
/showthread.php 195 build_forum_breadcrumb






Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sphere Scripting Contract Board
Author Message
Nachtmusique
Journeyman
*

Posts: 89
Likes Given: 0
Likes Received: 6 in 6 posts
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 0



Post: #5
RE: Sphere Scripting Contract Board
All valid concerns. I will address them as best I can...

Legal Issues -
I don't know the legal situation in all countries, but as far as EA vs. Sphere; perhaps it would be best to use a 3rd party freelance system for this. This would separate the Emulator from the Script service, but still allow Sphere members to post a link to their page on the 3rd party site. In this case, I don't think Sphere could take a commission, but for legal reasons it might be best for Sphere not to take a cut anyway.

Complaints -
I assume this type of thing can be handled through the 3rd party system. However, even if it can't. I would say this is where the interviewing before hand comes in. If "all sales are final" then it is the responsibility of the buyer to make sure he trusts the scripter before agreeing to the service.

Avoiding Unauthorized Distribution -
This cannot be fixed, I'm afraid. It would certainly be on the honor of the people involved unfortunately. I'd say let the payment be for the commissioning of the script. Once it's done, either party is free to do as they like. Again, if the buyer wants the script to remain private, he will have to trust the scripter. I imagine these 3rd party systems have a way of ranking your service. If the scripter breaks trust, the buyer could leave negative feedback warning others potential buyers that the scripter is not trustworthy.

Paypal, Taxes, Etc -
If done through a third party, this would not be Sphere's problem. It would be between the scripters, paypal, and their government. Some scripters may decide they should not participate for legal reasons local to their area, that is their choice. Either way, it's none of sphere's concern.

EDIT:
oDesk looks promising for the contract work:

https://www.odesk.com/?from=verify

There's no monthly fees, just a 10% commission from what is paid by the buyer. So if the buyer pays $20, the scripter receives $18.

PPD sites like sharecash could be used for the scripter's store, though I think there may be a better option out there. I just haven't found it yet.
(This post was last modified: 04-09-2015 03:37 AM by Nachtmusique.)
04-09-2015 03:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
RE: Sphere Scripting Contract Board - XuN - 04-08-2015, 04:49 PM
RE: Sphere Scripting Contract Board - Nachtmusique - 04-09-2015 03:08 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)