![]() |
Spellbar - Printable Version +- SphereCommunity (https://forum.spherecommunity.net) +-- Forum: Sphere 0.56d (/Forum-Sphere-0-56d) +--- Forum: Script Submissions (/Forum-Script-Submissions) +--- Thread: Spellbar (/Thread-Spellbar) Pages: 1 2 |
Spellbar - Alaric - 12-24-2013 10:05 AM Some may use it... works for basic 8x8 spells from sb. For custom spells you would have to store gump_id and spell_id. I think its too much information in a tag.:-/ I'll love you for reporting some bugs :-) Use .spellbar or later .spellbar_setup to set it up. ![]() RE: Spellbar - Avatar - 12-24-2013 08:26 PM You know that there is save desktop ![]() ![]() RE: Spellbar - Alaric - 12-25-2013 01:35 AM Family shards might use it... I didn't want to set direct size of spells because some players have smaller icons (I do ![]() How did you think the "save desktop"? The dumb system, that all icons are moveable and hardly organized? ![]() Btw. an idea came to mind..in spelldefinion would be good semething like icon="gump id". That would be useful for custom spells/spellbooks. E: I'll think of a better optimization - but I'm not sure whether it is possible. RE: Spellbar - Feeh - 12-25-2013 07:02 AM I don't think this would impact the server performance in any way Take the time that Sphere would use to write a 1kb string to the disk then multiply it by 1000 players, maybe 0.1 or 0.2 second increase in the save time? RunUO does not have anything similar like tags, so each item type has its own "binary save format" and every custom item may also be saved in its "own format" and there is no performance issue that can be related to the save diversity Gumps also does not impact on the network performance, Vorspire from RUO developed a system called Super Gumps that updates itself about 10 to 20 times itself on the client screen with no performance issues (A gump progress bar that is updated really fast to show the spell cast time can be used as example) I don't know how sphere deal with gumps, but since this spell bar does not need a fast update, there would be no performance issues related to it Optimization is always welcome, but you will be fighting for performance against memory/disk usage I would not fear using this system in a live server, unless I had a very limited hardware; I would just test it before it goes live, like anything else RE: Spellbar - Tymaron - 12-31-2015 05:26 AM Can you fix image's link please? RE: Spellbar - membaco - 04-22-2016 06:27 AM Thank You RE: Spellbar - nuke1985 - 12-22-2016 03:16 AM fix image pls RE: Spellbar - lokman - 10-08-2017 06:19 PM thank you bro RE: Spellbar - lewless53 - 04-01-2020 01:57 AM Thank you brom RE: Spellbar - madda - 09-26-2020 12:24 AM thank you bro |